15bf277bee
Rule now carries a required Jurisdiction (land) field, and Facts a matching Jurisdiction supplied by the caller (like Platform — no legal jurisdiction can be read off a caption or image, so the model never guesses it). Evaluate() only lets a rule fire when its jurisdiction matches the facts' jurisdiction. This is the structural half of "deutsche Rechtslage zuerst, Struktur für Österreich und Schweiz vorgesehen": a future AT/CH rule set can be added as plain new YAML files without touching existing DE rules, but no AT/CH content is added now — that needs its own legal research first, same as WK-001/WK-004 needed for Germany. WK-001 and WK-004 are tagged land: DE, all golden fixtures carry jurisdiction: DE, and extract.Input passes Jurisdiction through unchanged into the returned Facts. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
14 lines
333 B
JSON
14 lines
333 B
JSON
{
|
|
"name": "Gegenleistung unklar - Rueckfrage statt Bewertung",
|
|
"facts": {
|
|
"platform": "instagram",
|
|
"jurisdiction": "DE",
|
|
"consideration": "unklar",
|
|
"disclosure_present": false,
|
|
"disclosure_wording": "",
|
|
"disclosure_before_cut": false
|
|
},
|
|
"expected_findings": [],
|
|
"expect_needs_clarification": true
|
|
}
|