feat: add rules engine (internal/rules) with first two disclosure rules
internal/rules implements Stufe 2 from the core principle: the LLM extracts facts, this deterministic engine judges them against versioned YAML rules. Facts/Condition/Rule/Finding types, a loader that refuses to load on a missing id/version or a duplicate rule id rather than silently skipping a bad file, and Evaluate() matching facts against rules. Two real rules grounded in verified research (see rules/OPEN.md for the open questions that surfaced along the way): - WK-001: no disclosure at all despite consideration (§ 5a Abs. 4 UWG, § 22 Abs. 1 MStV) - WK-004: disclosure present but hidden behind a "mehr anzeigen" cut (§ 5a Abs. 4 UWG, Leitfaden der Medienanstalten, LG Köln 12.05.2026) The two are deliberately disjoint (WK-004 requires disclosure_present= true) so a post with no disclosure at all doesn't double-fire both rules. Golden suite in testdata/golden/ covers both rules plus two clean cases; it's this suite, not the UI, that's the actual asset per CLAUDE.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
105
internal/rules/rule_test.go
Normal file
105
internal/rules/rule_test.go
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
|
||||
package rules_test
|
||||
|
||||
import (
|
||||
"testing"
|
||||
"testing/fstest"
|
||||
|
||||
"github.com/netcell-it/deklarix/internal/rules"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
func TestLoadRejectsMissingID(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
fsys := fstest.MapFS{
|
||||
"bad.yaml": &fstest.MapFile{Data: []byte("version: 1\ntitel: x\nschwere: hoch\n")},
|
||||
}
|
||||
if _, err := rules.Load(fsys); err == nil {
|
||||
t.Fatal("expected error for rule without id, got nil")
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestLoadRejectsMissingVersion(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
fsys := fstest.MapFS{
|
||||
"bad.yaml": &fstest.MapFile{Data: []byte("id: WK-999\ntitel: x\nschwere: hoch\n")},
|
||||
}
|
||||
if _, err := rules.Load(fsys); err == nil {
|
||||
t.Fatal("expected error for rule without version, got nil")
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestLoadRejectsDuplicateID(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
fsys := fstest.MapFS{
|
||||
"a.yaml": &fstest.MapFile{Data: []byte("id: WK-999\nversion: 1\ntitel: x\nschwere: hoch\n")},
|
||||
"b.yaml": &fstest.MapFile{Data: []byte("id: WK-999\nversion: 2\ntitel: y\nschwere: hoch\n")},
|
||||
}
|
||||
if _, err := rules.Load(fsys); err == nil {
|
||||
t.Fatal("expected error for duplicate rule id, got nil")
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestLoadIgnoresNonYAMLFiles(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
fsys := fstest.MapFS{
|
||||
"a.yaml": &fstest.MapFile{Data: []byte("id: WK-999\nversion: 1\ntitel: x\nschwere: hoch\n")},
|
||||
"README.md": &fstest.MapFile{Data: []byte("not a rule")},
|
||||
}
|
||||
got, err := rules.Load(fsys)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("Load: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if len(got) != 1 {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("expected 1 rule, got %d", len(got))
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestConditionMatches(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
yes := true
|
||||
no := false
|
||||
|
||||
cases := []struct {
|
||||
name string
|
||||
cond rules.Condition
|
||||
fact rules.Facts
|
||||
want bool
|
||||
}{
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "consideration list matches",
|
||||
cond: rules.Condition{Consideration: []rules.Consideration{rules.ConsiderationPaid}},
|
||||
fact: rules.Facts{Consideration: rules.ConsiderationPaid},
|
||||
want: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "consideration list does not match",
|
||||
cond: rules.Condition{Consideration: []rules.Consideration{rules.ConsiderationPaid}},
|
||||
fact: rules.Facts{Consideration: rules.ConsiderationNone},
|
||||
want: false,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "disclosure present must match",
|
||||
cond: rules.Condition{DisclosurePresent: &no},
|
||||
fact: rules.Facts{DisclosurePresent: true},
|
||||
want: false,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "unset fields impose no constraint",
|
||||
cond: rules.Condition{},
|
||||
fact: rules.Facts{Consideration: rules.ConsiderationUnclear},
|
||||
want: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "all constraints must hold (AND)",
|
||||
cond: rules.Condition{
|
||||
Consideration: []rules.Consideration{rules.ConsiderationPaid},
|
||||
DisclosurePresent: &yes,
|
||||
DisclosureBeforeCut: &no,
|
||||
},
|
||||
fact: rules.Facts{Consideration: rules.ConsiderationPaid, DisclosurePresent: true, DisclosureBeforeCut: false},
|
||||
want: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for _, tc := range cases {
|
||||
t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
if got := tc.cond.Matches(tc.fact); got != tc.want {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("Matches() = %v, want %v", got, tc.want)
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user